2Peter 1:12-21 (web)

Essential Reminders

1:12 Therefore I will not be negligent to remind you of these things,
though you know them, and are established in the present truth.
 
1:13 I think it right, as long as I am in this tent, to stir you up by reminding you;
1:14 knowing that the putting off of my tent comes swiftly,
even as our Lord Jesus Christ made clear to me.
1:15 Yes, I will make every effort that you may always be able
to remember these things even after my departure.

The Grounds of Our Faith

1. The Testimony of the Apostles

1:16 For we did not follow cunningly devised fables,
when we made known to you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ,
but we were eyewitnesses of his majesty.
 
1:17 For he received from God the Father honor and glory,
when the voice came to him from the Majestic Glory,
"This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased." (Luke 9:35)

1:18 This voice we heard come out of heaven
when we were with him in the holy mountain.

2. The Testimony of the Prophets

1:19 We have the more sure word of prophecy;
whereunto you do well that you take heed, as to a lamp shining in a dark place,
until the day dawns, and the day star arises in your hearts: (Rev 22:16)
1:20 knowing this first, that no prophecy of Scripture is of private interpretation.
1:21 For no prophecy ever came by the will of man:
but holy men of God spoke, being moved by the Holy Spirit.

Discussion Questions

vs 12 If Christians are firmly established in the truth, what value is there in reminding them of the same things they already know?
vs 13-15 Why is Peter urgent in reminding them?
vs 16 Have you ever heard people accuse the apostles of just making up the stories about Jesus, and particularly his miracles?
There are some liberal theologians (particularly those of the "Jesus Seminar" type), who believe that much of the gospel accounts were mere fabrications - mere storytelling myths. Does Peter affirm that the gospels are accurate historical accounts?
vs 17-18 Is Peter saying about Luke 9:35 that God actually spoke these words or did he just make this up as an interesting story?
If Peter and the others did just fabricate these stories, then according to this section, are they liars?
vs 19 What word of the prophets was made more certain?
What is it that we should pay attention to according to this verse?
vs 20-21 Is Peter declaring Old Testament prophecies to be prophecies of future events, some of which now have actually occurred?
 

Comment

vs 12-15 In view of your impending death, what is the most important thing you would like to pass on to the next generation? To Peter it was the essential facts and truths he was communicating here in 2nd Peter. These include the historic and miraculous basis of our faith as recorded in the gospels, but it also includes in Chapter 1 an exhortation to apply one's faith and grow to maturity. And this is particularly relevant to many Christians today who consider living the Christian life to be simply optional, considering "faith in Christ" to have little correlation to the Christian's actual behavior. But Peter will deal with these and other heresies in chapters 2 and 3.

vs 16-18

Historical Miracles & Liberal Theology

Notice the conflict with liberal theology - If the gospels were fabrications made merely to teach some concepts, but were not actual history, then Peter is lying as he clearly states here that they represent actual history, and not only so, but is a false teacher, a deceiver and hypocrite, as he condemns such people throughout chapter 2. Yet such accounts could have been easily verified or shown to be false from independent sources as "For the king knoweth of these things, before whom also I speak freely: for I am persuaded that none of these things are hidden from him; for this thing was not done in a corner." (Acts 26:26) The foundation of belief in Christ was miracles. If such did not occur, people would have known that the Christian faith was based on lies. Furthermore truth and honesty are emphasized as essential to Christian character. In light of these things, the fact that Christianity survived through the first century is its greatest proof of being based on truth.

The specific event in vs 17-18 that Peter is referring to is what has been called the "Transfiguration". It's found in Luke 9:28-36

vs 19-20

Example of Prophecy: Daniel 9:25+

"Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times."sevens" refers to weeks of years: 7x7 + 62x7 = 483 years
It will be rebuilt with streets and a trench, but in times of trouble.
After the sixty-two 'sevens,' the Anointed One will be cut off and will have nothing.
In 445 BC Artaxerxes issued a decree to allow the Jews to establish worship and Jewish law in Judah. 69 weeks is 483 days…(69 weeks X 7 days in a week). If you consider a "prophetic day for a year" principle, you would add 483 years from the date of the decree in 445 BC. If it began in 445 B.C., and you add to that four hundred and eighty-three years, to the exact month (because we know that the month in which the edict to rebuild Jerusalem was issued was the Hebrew month Nisan, which corresponds about to our April), then it brings us down to April, 32 A.D., which includes adjustments due to the ancients using 360 day/year, which would be really made it 476 years, and also adding one year because there is no year zero.

Know of anyone claiming to be the Messiah who was cut off in April, 32 AD?

The "day star" or "morning star" mentioned in vs 19 is Jesus as he says in Rev 22:16 "I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star." (kjv) Although the exact same greek words are not used. And it is also mentioned in Rev 2:28. In the context of 2nd Peter, "the light that shines" refers to the gospel. The "dark place" is the world in which we live. "until" indicates a future event. The "day dawning" is the return of Christ, which Peter speaks of in chapter 3. "Arising in your hearts" refers to the revealing and glorification of the sons of God in their resurrection - much as a star (actually it's the planet venus) rises in the morning preceeding the glory of the sun. For now we put our faith in and live according to God's Word. But there will come a day when we are raised from the dead when all will be actualized and revealed. And such an event will precede the glorious establishment of the New Jerusalem in which we will live in the presence of God blamelessly in sinless perfection.

vs 20 This is not talking about the interpretation of prophecy, but rather the fact that when the prophets wrote the prophecies, these prophecies themselves were not the private interpretations or personal opinions of the prophets. In fact the prophets may not have really understood all that they were saying, as 1Peter 1:10-11 also indicates, "Of which salvation the prophets have enquired and searched diligently, who prophesied of the grace that should come unto you: Searching what, or what manner of time the Spirit of Christ which was in them did signify, when it testified beforehand the sufferings of Christ, and the glory that should follow." For they were simply mouth pieces or instruments of God, being moved by the Holy Spirit. But though previously hidden, under the New Covenant much of these prophecies have now been revealed.

However, I have heard of those who mishandle verse 20. They interpret verse 20 to mean that the interpretation of the Bible should be left to an elite clergy and not allowed by private individuals. This kind of foolish heretical interpretation has simply been propagated because who is going to disagree with it? The only people who have generally been allowed to speak in the history of post-Biblical Christianity have been the elite clergy. Why should they disagree with an idea that supports their elitist position? But if we handle the Word of God correctly, almost anyone can see that this is clearly not what the verse is talking about. The way they interpret it is to contrast "private interpretation" (kjv) with "the interpretation of an elite group of religious leaders", which they interject into the text, reading into the Bible what is not there. The NIV gives a clearer sense of the verse saying, "Above all, you must understand that no prophecy of Scripture came about by the prophet's own interpretation."


2Peter 1:12-21 RAP

1:12 I will remind you of these things long-term
Even though you know them and in the truth stand firm
13 I think that it is right to refresh your memory
As long as I may live in this tent of my body
14 Because I really feel I will soon put it aside
As Jesus made it clear to me and with him I'll abide
15 I will make every effort to see that when I go
You will remember all these things I know.
16 I tell you we didn't invent the story
But saw Jesus himself in his glory
17 For he received honor from the Father who spoke from the sky
I am quite certain and we don't lie
18 We heard this voice that came from above
On that mountain he said "This is my Son whom I love"
19 The word of the prophets is made more sure
Pay attention to it as if it were
A light that was shining in a dark place
Until you see Jesus face to face
20 But firstly know that no prophet's oration
Was a matter of the prophets's own interpretation
21 Prophecy never came from man's will as I hear it
But men spoke from God as they were carried by the Spirit


The Boston Christian Bible Study Resources


Jan 15,2008